Blog & news

Motions Committee 2018, Power-pairing method voting results

The online ballot of the WSDC Tournament Committee has now concluded.

38 nations (out of 52 eligible to vote) cast their ballots. Those nations
were: Australia, Barbados, Canada, China, Croatia, Czech Republic,
Denmark, England, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, India, Indonesia,
Ireland, Israel, Lithuania, Nepal, New Zealand, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru,
Philippines, Qatar, Romania, Scotland, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, South
Africa, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Sweden, Taiwan, Turkey, Uganda, United
States and Wales.

For some of the items on the ballot, the final results were extremely close
(in 2 cases being decided by a margin of just 1 vote). We have recounted
the votes very carefully to be certain of the results.

The final results of the various items on the ballot are as follows:

Motions Committee for WSDC 2018

Sharmila Parmanand (Philippines) – 31 votes (*ELECTED*)

Kevin Moar (New Zealand) – 25 votes (*ELECTED*)

Scott Ralston (Scotland) – 20 votes (*ELECTED*)

Luke Churchyard (South Africa) – 19 votes (*ELECTED*)

Alex de Jager (Qatar) – 14 votes (*ELECTED*)

Jumin Lee (South Korea) – 13 votes

Isabel Mateos Méndez (Mexico) – 13 votes

David Moscovici (Romania) – 13 votes

Janet Stevens (Scotland) – 10 votes

Sebastian Vera (Argentina) – 9 votes

The 5 individuals elected will be serving on the Motions Committee together
with 2 further members who will be appointed by the host organising
committee in Zagreb. The Hosts will be announcing the 2 appointed members

Power-Pairing Issue A
*Should the Rules specify whether the ‘seeded rounds’ (preliminary rounds 1
and 2) must be prepared or impromptu debates?*

Option 1: Rounds 1 and 2 should both prepared – 20 votes (*CHOSEN OPTION*)

Option 2: 1 prepared debate and 1 impromptu debate – 8 votes

Option 3: Allow the Hosts to decide – 7 votes

Abstentions: 3

Power-Pairing Issue B
*If a team needs to be ‘pulled-up’ to a higher bracket, how shall that team
be determined?*

Option 1: As far as possible, the team from the bracket below which has had
the ‘easiest’ opponents up to that point shall be ‘pulled-up’ – 26
votes (*CHOSEN

Option 2: Randomly selected team from the bracket below shall be
‘pulled-up’ – 11 votes

Abstentions: 1

Power-Pairing Issue C
*Within each bracket, how should the computer tabulation programme aim to
pair teams up for each debate round?*

Option 1: As far as possible, the draw within each bracket should be a
folding table – 17 votes

Option 2: As far as possible, the draw within each bracket should be a
sliding table – 13 votes

Option 3: Teams should be randomly drawn against other teams in the bracket
– 8 votes

Abstentions: 0

*As no option received an overall majority, Option 3 was eliminated
(because it had the least votes) and the votes of the 8 delegates who voted
for Option 3 were transferred to their 2nd choice option. The final result
was: *

Option 1: As far as possible, the draw within each bracket should be a
folding table – 17 + 2 = 19 votes (*CHOSEN OPTION*)

Option 2: As far as possible, the draw within each bracket should be a
sliding table – 13 + 5 = 18 votes

Abstentions: 0 + 1 = 1

Power-Pairing Issue D
*Should teams be allowed to face debate against each other more than once
during the preliminary rounds?*

Option 1: No – 23 votes (*CHOSEN OPTION*)

Option 2: Yes – 15 votes

Abstentions: 0

Power-Pairing Issue E
*Should every team be given exactly 4 debates in proposition and exactly 4
debates in opposition over the 8 preliminary rounds?*

Option 1: Yes – 11

Option 2: No – 26 (*CHOSEN OPTION*)

Abstentions: 1

Power-Pairing Issue F
*What should happen in the event that there is an odd number of competing

Option 1: The Host and the Chief Adjudicators shall decide – 10 votes

Option 2: A swing team will be added to the draw – 21 votes (*CHOSEN

Option 3: A team will be given a walkover victory in each round – 7 votes

Abstentions: 1

Based on the above results, a fully updated version of the power-pairing
rules for WSDC 2018 will be compiled and released to the WSDC community.

Power-pairing is being implemented as a 1-year trail at WSDC 2018, so the
power-pairing rules will be a temporary amendment to the WSDC Rules for
2018 only. At the end of the 2018 championship, the Tournament Committee
will be able to decided whether it wishes to implement power-pairing again
at future WSDCs.


Mark Gabriel & Christopher Sanchez
Returning Officers

Power-Pairing Proposal Documents

Mark Gabriel, member of the Board of Directors, has sent out an e-mail on 14th JAN 2018, informing the community about the voting issues on the final shape of the power-pairing proposal taking effect in Zagreb 2018. This is its original text:

When the World Schools Debating Championships Tournament Committee met in August last year in Bali, it was decided that ‘power-pairing’ will be implemented for a 1-year trial period for the preliminary rounds of WSDC 2018 in Zagreb.


A set of temporary amendments to the WSDC Rules outlining the procedures for power-pairing was presented in Bali by the outgoing Tournament Committee Executive. However there were a few specific issues regarding certain aspects of the procedures raised during the discussions at the meeting in Bali. The Tournament Committee therefore decided that, while power-pairing will definitely go ahead in Zagreb, an online ballot of the Tournament Committee would be held in order to make some decisions about a few aspects of the procedures, and the incoming WSDC Ltd Board of Directors was tasked to organise the ballot.


Over the past couple of months, the Draw Working Group (which was created by last year’s Executive and was asked to continue its work by the Board) has, based on the discussions in Bali, created a list of issues which need to be put to a vote and has drafted possible amendments to the original proposals presented in Bali. These have been shared with and approved by the WSDC Ltd Board of Directors.


The WSDC Ltd Board of Directors plans to hold an online ballot of the Tournament Committee from 9th – 11th FEB 2018.


There are 6 issues regarding the power-pairing procedures which we plan to put to a vote:


     Issue A:  Should the Rules specify whether the ‘seeded rounds’ (preliminary rounds 1 and 2) must be prepared or impromptu debates?
     Issue B:  If a team needs to be ‘pulled-up’ to a higher bracket, how shall that team be determined?
     Issue C:  Within each bracket, how should the computer tabulation programme aim to pair teams up for each debate round?
     Issue D:  Should teams be allowed to face debate against each other more than once during the preliminary rounds?
     Issue E:  Should every team be given exactly 4 debates in proposition and exactly 4 debates in opposition over the 8 preliminary rounds?
     Issue F:  What should happen in the event that there is an odd number of competing nations?


There are 3 documents attached to this e-mail. They are:


     (i)  The full text of the original power-pairing proposal presented in Bali.

WSDC Power-Pairing Proposal Issues (Edited)

     (ii)  A list the various options related to the 6 issues noted above and information on the potential implications of each option. (For some issues there are 2 options, and for some issues there are 3.)

WSDC Power-Pairing Proposal Original Text (Edited)

     (iii)  Amendments to the text of the original proposal presented in Bali in the event that alternative options are chosen.

WSDC Power-Pairing Proposal Text Amendments (Edited)

The representatives of each WSDC nation are encouraged to read through these documents and start thinking about how they would like their official voting representative to vote in the upcoming online ballot.


Anyone who has any thoughts regarding any of the issues which they would like to share with the rest of the WSDC community can do so through the WSDC Netpals mailing list.


Each nation which has entered a team in at least 2 of the last 3 WSDC championships (Singapore 2015, Stuttgart 2016 and Bali 2017) will be eligible to have 1 official voting delegate cast votes in the ballot. Details of the dates and voting procedures will be released shortly.

In addition to voting on the power-pairing procedures, the online ballot will also include the election for 5 members of the Motions Committee for WSDC 2018. (Candidates who wish to nominate themselves for the Motions Committee need to submit the nomination forms by by Thursday 18th January at 12:00 PM GMT.)


Voting will take place on the weekend of 9th-11th FEB 2018. Every nation’s voting delegate must login at to cast votes. You can register for a new account here.

Further information regarding the online ballot will follow in a few days’ time.


Mark Gabriel
Member, WSDC Ltd Board of Directors


Conferral Judging defeated, Break expanded

An Online Ballot concerning two motions on the introduction of Conferral Judging for a one-year trial period at WSDC 2017 in Bali, Indonesia, as well as expanding the break to 32 teams, has taken place between 16th and 19th April 2017.

Proposal A (Conferral Judging) can be viewed here.
Proposal B (Break Expansion) can be viewed here.

Mark Gabriel (Singapore), Chair of the WSDC Tournament Executive Committee, has released the results on 19th APR to the WSDC community.

It reads as follows:

“The online ballot of the World Schools Debating Championships Tournament Committee has now closed.

53 nations were eligible to vote in the ballot.

39 nations cast their votes. The 39 nations which voted were:  Argentina, Barbados, Bermuda, Canada, China, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, England, Estonia, Germany, Greece, Hong Kong, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Israel, Korea, Lithuania, Malaysia, Mexico, Morocco, New Zealand, Nigeria, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Qatar, Romania, Scotland, Singapore, Slovakia, Slovenia, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, United States and Wales.

The results of the ballot were as follows –

Proposal A:  Conferral Judging for WSDC 2017  –  DEFEATED

     Votes in favour  –  16
     Votes against  –  21
     Abstentions  –  2

Therefore there will NOT be conferral judging at WSDC 2017. (Debates will be judged in the same way as they have a previous WSDCs.)


Proposal B:  Expansion of the break for WSDC 2017  –  PASSED
     Votes in favour  –  29
     Votes against  –  10

     Abstentions  –  0

Therefore the break at WSDC 2017 will be further expanded for a 1-year trial period.

The key things to note are:
     –  There will be a Partial Double Octo-Final round.
     –  The overall number of teams which break will be a minimum of 24 and a maximum of 32. All teams which win at least 5 preliminary round debates should break (unless more than 32 teams win at least 5 debates – which is unlikely).
     –  The number of teams participating in the Partial Double Octo-Final round will depend on the number of teams which break, but at least 16 teams will participate in the Partial Double Octo-Final round (and it’s at least theoretically possible that all 32 breaking teams could be involved in the Partial Double Octo-Final round if a very large number of teams win at least 5 debates).

     –  All of this is dependent on there being at least 48 teams competing in the championship. (If less than 48 teams participate, then there will be a 16-team break with no Partial Double Oct-Final round.)

Question 3

There was a 3rd question in the online ballot asking what delegates would like to do if Proposal B was not passed – but since Proposal B was passed, the responses to this 3rd question are now irrelevant. (Nevertheless if anyone is curious, there were 36 votes for the 24-team break option, 2 votes for the 16-team break option and 1 abstention.)

Mark Gabriel
Chair, WSDC Tournament Committee Executive”


If you want to stay up-to-date with events around WSDC, please sign up with the NETPALS mailing list.

Vacancies for new Directors

Dear members of the WSDC community,

The Directors would like to invite candidates who are interested in taking a leadership role within the WSDC community to stand for election to the Board of Directors. Candidates should be willing to spend about one half day per month working on WSDC business. The Directors hope to fill three open seats on the Board at this year’s AGM.

Should the restructuring proposals before this year’s AGM pass, one of the most significant differences in our organization will be the merging of the Board of Directors and the Tournament Executive Committee, producing a single, unified governing body for the community. As a member of the Board of Directors, successful candidates would play a pivotal role in integrating the business side of WSDC Ltd. and the debating side of the organization over the coming year.

Candidates should send a short personal statement outlining their suitability for the role to [email protected] by Monday, January 16. Elections will be held at the end of the AGM.

Do let me know if you have any questions.

Best regards,

Daragh Grant
Director, WSDC Ltd

3 nations bid to host WSDC in 2018

Three nations have submitted bids to host the World Schools Debating Championships in 2018. Links to their bid documents can be found below.

Bid to host WSDC 2018 in Zagreb, Croatia

Bid to host WSDC 2018 in Daejeon, Korea

Bid to host WSDC 2018 in Owerri, Nigeria

The decision as to where the 2018 World Schools Debating Championships will be held will be made by the WSDC Tournament Committee during this year’s WSDC in Stuttgart. One voting delegate from each nation participating in this year’s WSDC will be entitled to vote when the Tournament Committee meets in Stuttgart.


Motions for WSDC 2016

Dear global debating community

We are happy to announce this year’s WSDC motions. We thank all involved, who have devoted very much time and effort into creating these four prepared and one Grand Final motion.

The following motions are not yet in any particular order, so no rounds have been assigned to them yet. This will be announced at a later date.

Here they are:

Preliminary rounds:

  • This House would require democratic states to hold a national referendum to ratify any free trade agreements
  • This House believes that the Obama Administration’s foreign policy has done more harm than good
  • This House believes that technology companies with significant market shares should not be eligible for patent protection
  • This House believes that, after meeting their basic needs, individuals have a moral responsibility to donate their wealth towards poverty alleviation

Grand Final motion:

  • This House believes that states should be allowed to pay other states to relocate and settle refugees

We thank the motions committee for their great work:

  • Aisha Ahmad, Pakistan
  • Anna England Kerr, England
  • Daniel Swain, Australia
  • Georgie Barker, Scotland
  • Kaspar Kelder, Estonia
  • Paidamwoyo Mangondo, South Africa
  • Udayan Mukherjee, New Zealand

See more at the WSDC 2016 website.

Memorial for Alfred “Tuna” Snider

A memorial for Alfred “Tuna” Snider, the Coach of Team USA who died in December, will be held at 4pm EDT (Eastern Daylight Time) tomorrow, the 29th April.  His many friends, colleagues and students around the world can watch a live stream of the memorial.


Live music: Bobby Hackney, A Band Called Death, Lambsbread


William Falls
Professor, Dean of the College of Arts and Sciences

Video “Until We Meet Again…”

Charlie Chafer
Chief Executive Officer, Space Services Holdings, Inc.

Scott Wunn
Executive Director of the National Speech & Debate Association.

Video “Traveling globally for debate to make a world a better place”

Guohong Xu
Head of Department of Rhetoric and Communication, School of Foreign Languages, Beihang University, Beijing, China.

Video “Stop Complaining and Start Producing!”

Becca White
‘15, former LDU team president. Current solar power organizer and Vice chair of Select Board, Hartford, VT.

John Meany
Director of Forensics at Claremont McKenna College.


Live music: Bobby Hackney

One day I shall come back. Yes, I shall come back. Until then, there must be no regrets, no tears, no anxieties. Just go forward in all of your beliefs and prove to me that I am not mistaken in mine.”

– the Doctor, Season 2, Episode 9, “Flashpoint”, 26 December, 1964

Our thoughts are with Tuna’s family and friends, especially his wife Bojana Skrt, and we hope tomorrow is a warm send-off for a remarkable man.


Alfred “Tuna” Snider, RIP

Alfred Snider (known to all as Tuna) died today. He was the Professor of Debate at the University of Vermont in Burlington; but he is being mourned by thousands across the world, who were enthralled by his lectures and classes in debate on almost every continent.

It is easy to judge America and Americans by the likes of Donald Trump. There’s another America, and another American, that paints a very different picture of the USA. Tuna empowered and inspired students in countries too numerous to mention, including many that the media portrays as terrorist battle grounds. He fought against tyranny, oppression and fundamentalism – not with bombs and bullets, but with the greatest weapons of all: free speech, and the open discussion of ideas. He made a lasting positive mark on the world that will endure long after the likes of Donald Trump are reduced to hyperlinks to Page 404 Unobtainable .

In his deeds and words, Tuna reminded us of what actually makes America great. It is not military power or immense wealth. It is values and ideals – of tolerance, free expression, listening to others, engaging in discussion and debate, respecting different views. Tuna spread these generously and enthusiastically wherever he went.

Yet he would reject the suggestion that these values and ideals are exclusively American. He was a citizen of the world (who happened to be American), who promoted values and ideals that he passionately believed are universal.

The tributes to Tuna reveal a man with an appalling taste in flowery shirts, a quirky sense of humour, an obsession with strangely filtered pics on Instagram, a devotion to Doctor Who, and a deep love for his wife, soul mate and fellow debate teacher, Bojana Skrt from Slovenia. Theirs was the ultimate long-distance relationship, improbably born in international debating tournaments, and cemented through debate championships, lectures and conferences they attended together across the globe.

And today, Tuna has embarked on his longest and most ambitious journey, from this life to whatever lies beyond. Travel spirits be kind; may he travel in peace.

AGM 2015: the future of WSDC Ltd


From 2002 to 2007, the WSDC Executive Committee tried but failed to develop a fundraising arm, through a volunteer Finance Committee. It was felt that the goal was right but the execution needed a proper strategy and structure.

In 2008, 29 countries voted (unanimously) in favour of the legal incorporation of WSDC as a company registered in the United Kingdom (under the law of England & Wales). The UK was chosen as being the country with the highest concentration of WSDC alumni from many countries who, it was hoped, would help the new company to develop; incorporation in the UK is relatively straightforward; and also a base in London offered easy access to potential corporate donors. The company was incorporated on 6 August 2008.

The initial goal was to develop WSDC as a business for the first time, over and above – not instead of – the activities of the Executive Committee. It hoped to include the energy and skills of alumni who had gone on to professional careers but may no longer actively participate in tournaments.

As Andrea Coomber, the first Chair of the Board of Directors, emailed to the community in October 2010:

When our community decided to create an incorporated body to advance these objectives it did so not to create a bureaucracy that would control all the activities of the WSDC. It is important to note that WSDC Ltd. plays no role in the annual organization of the championships, has no interest in the rules of debate, the management of the tournament, the eligibility of nations, etc. Under the Rules the Council and the Executive address these. While it is very early days, ultimately the WSDC Ltd. will act as a business engine for financing, expanding and profiling schools’ debating internationally.

Read more about the history of WSDC Ltd.

The goals of WSDC Ltd

The evolving goals of the company and its Board of Directors have included the following, categorised according to success levels:


  • To establish a membership association;
  • (After a vote of members in 2011) to levy membership fees in order to raise an annual income for the company;
  • To publish information about WSDC on its website
  • To grow an online community, in partnership with the Executive, around its mailing list (1100+ subscribers), Twitter feed (1400+ followers) and Facebook page (4500+ followers)
  • To set up a bank account (HSBC in the UK)
  • To get sponsorship worth £3000/year for costs of its online activities including website hosting, development and membership platform

Limited success

  • To encourage membership amongst tournament alumni;
  • To raise funds through membership fees (after a vote of members in 2011);
  • To connect alumni and share memories and opportunities.

Unsuccessful, or not attempted

  • To qualify for charitable status in the UK (£5000 per year for full qualification (see below));
  • To improve consistency and quality control of tournaments through establishment of a contract to be signed with hosts;
  • To raise additional funding through a small percentage of registration fees;
  • To raise significant funding through corporate sponsorship;
  • To develop & implement a central registration facility for teams and adjudicators, to be be shared by future hosts (contingent on establishing a hosting contract);
  • To help new countries to attend;
  • To help existing countries to trial more students for their teams;
  • To ease the financial burden on future hosts;
  • To lower registration fees for all participants;
  • To develop training materials for new teams;
  • To appoint and continue a Competitors’ Advisory Board to involve high school students in the organisational structure (never appointed);
  • To appoint and maintain a Development Committee of alumni, responsible for the day-to-day management of the company (appointed but disbanded);
  • To take out insurance for Directors and other company officials who may be liable for tournament-related lawsuits;
  • To trademark the WSDC name and/or logo.

Why has the company not achieved more?

There are many reasons but perhaps the following are most significant.

  • The volunteer model; it is easier to get energy and action from unpaid volunteers over shorter periods and on focused tasks (e.g. tournaments, which create a clear agenda) than all year round on more general activities;
  • Lack of communication to the community (after the initial popular votes on incorporation and membership fees), to explain the company’s goals and activities, and encourage a wider group of people to get involved;
  • Failure to energise the hoped-for base of alumni in the UK;
  • A confusion throughout the community about the structure of the company and the division of responsibilities between Board and Executive – a confusion shared, at times, by Board and Executive members too;
  • Failure to properly market the benefits of membership.

The review process

In March 2015, the Board of Directors held an online forum inviting members of the community (paid members and non-members) to give their views on the future of WSDC Ltd, the company. In May 2015, a Review Panel was formed to look into recommendations, with the following volunteers:

  • Tracey-Ann Lee – Canada
  • Menno Schellekens – The Netherlands
  • Andrej Schulcz – Slovakia
  • Cindi Timmons – USA
  • Mark Webber – Mexico

The Panel interviewed several alumni and former Directors and committee members of WSDC, and presented a report to the Board in September 2015.

In September/October 2015, the Board invited the Executive to nominate three of its members to join the Board as appointed Directors, to serve until the next elections (at which, should they take place and the new Directors be willing, they would be required to stand for election). Mark Gabriel (Exec Chair), Taimur Bandey (Exec Vice-Chair), and Cindi Timmons (Review Panel representative and Exec member) were duly appointed and registered with Companies House in the UK, to join existing Directors Christopher Erskine (Chair), Mehvesh Mumtaz Ahmed, Daragh Grant and Trevor Sather.

Since then the new Board has been discussing the recommendation of the Review Panel and other proposals for the future of WSDC.

Proposals for the future

None of the people involved in various conversations to date seem to disagree with the goals of the WSDC Ltd project; it is the execution that has been the problem. This raises the question of whether the goals should be abandoned, or attempted again with a different execution.

Rather than make one single proposal to the membership, the Board has decided to outline three different strategies, and invite the membership to discuss and endorse one in principle at the Annual General Meeting (AGM) in 2015. A formal proposal can then be worded and circulated, and then voted on at an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) after the appropriate notice period.

All three proposals would mean the company still exists after the vote, but for potentially very different time periods. In each case the new Board would be tasked with a specific endorsed strategy.

Option 1: Wind up the current organization
(Recommended by Review Panel)

This strategy would see the current attempt at legal status abandoned, and the existing company wound up. The Memorandum & Articles and bye laws would cease to exist.

The WSDC organisation would return roughly to where it was pre-2008, likely with an elected Executive and its working groups; but the Tournament Committee would determine the exact structure and new legislation for the future in a process organised by the Tournament Executive Committee.

Existing funds of the company would be used to cover any costs of winding up, and the remainder donated (as allowed by UK law) to a similar organisation. (Suggestions for such an organisation are welcome and one would be proposed for membership approval at an EGM.)

The digital assets of the company (website, mailing lists x 2, Twitter feed, Facebook group, LinkedIn group) – and the costs of running them – would be left to the Executive.

As part of any winding up process, a new draft of the rules governing the World Schools Debating Championships would need to be drafted. The Board proposes that this body of rules would be drafted and made available for the members to vote on at the same EGM at which WSDC Ltd. would be wound up.

Acknowledging the benefits that successful incorporation would bring to the WSDC, the Review Committee suggested that the Executive and Tournament Committee might want to incorporate again in another form and in a less onerous jurisdiction in the future. We haven’t explored this option in detail, for two reasons: (a) if an independent, incorporated WSDC company is still held to be a good idea, then the reasons for choosing the UK in the first place also still seem to be valid; and (b) if the problems with the project are to do with the volunteer model, lack of community buy-in and so on, then changing the country won’t help. As things stand, we haven’t heard a compelling reason to reincorporate in a new country.

Option 2: Keeping WSDC Ltd and fixing it

We haven’t discounted fixing the current model. If the goals of WSDC Ltd still find support, and if the current legal status shouldn’t be thrown away lightly (possibly creating a new burden of incorporation elsewhere), then some of the problems of their execution can be dealt with, as follows:

  • Confusion between Board and Exec? – merge the two, or make the Exec the primary committee, who manage all aspects of tournaments, including fundraising (and are insured to do so); instead of the Board, volunteers could assist with online activities and alumni relations.
  • Unable to raise £5000 per year to qualify as a charity in the UK? – actually, we don’t need to. The reasoning for this was to qualify for tax breaks so that corporate donors would be more likely to give funding; but there are ways for small charities to do this without the annual income.
  • Don’t have personnel on the ground in the UK? – in fact there is no requirement to have any UK-based directors for a UK-based company, nor to have any UK-based signatories for a UK-based bank account.
  • We can’t raise significant funding from membership fees? – instead we could ask for a small percentage of registration fees from each tournament to go to company activities; enough to pay for part-time professional fundraising assistance, for example. This fee could be levied in return for the provision of a centralized registration system to be used by all future hosts.

Option 3: Partnership with a third party

A final option is that WSDC Ltd. would be incorporated into an existing educational or debate-related non-profit that would be capable of ensuring that WSDC enjoyed the benefits of incorporation without depending on the current volunteer model. A partnership like this would need great thought and due diligence. If the principle is endorsed, WSDC Ltd would continue while the Board of Directors explored all available partnership options. Once the Board has vetted the available options, it would return the question of partnership to the members for their final approval.

To date, we have received one proposal for partnership, from the US-based National Speech & Debate Association. This proposal has not been subject to any negotiation, nor has the Board yet invited other third parties to submit partnership proposals. As such, the below should be taken as a first indication of the kinds of partnership possibilities that might be available to WSDC Ltd.

Partnership proposal from the National Speech & Debate Association

The National Speech & Debate Association (NSDA), US based 501 C3 nonprofit charity and membership organization (since 1925) has proposed a merger with WSDC. In the agreement, the NSDA would establish WSDC as a limited liability corporation in the United States, in which, NSDA would be the legal owner for a trial period of three-years. During this period the NSDA would establish WSDC with an approved framework which would allow existing WSDC leadership to retain all decision-making controls in governance and policy making.

The NSDA would serve as the administrative service provider for WSDC. In this role, NSDA, in collaboration with WSDC leadership, would build the appropriate organization infrastructure for success in the key goal areas of the original mandate of the WSDC charity. These areas would include financial development, marketing/public relations, legal compliance and trademarking, and insurance.

In an effort to ensure success of the new strategies, the NSDA would contribute a minimum of $15,000 USD in staffing and resource annually to the implementation of the the WSDC strategic goals as established by the WSDC leadership. Also, the NSDA would contribute a minimum of $5,000 USD annually to the current WSDC host. In addition, the NSDA would contribute up to $15,000 USD in additional resources, if fundraising efforts allowed.

At the end of the initial three-year period, WSDC members and the NSDA would be invited to consider making the arrangement permanent. Absent a nomination and 2/3 vote for a new partnership or new direction for WSDC, the existing arrangement with the NSDA would become permanent, with documents drafted to deal with potential severance between NSDA and WSDC in future.

Next steps

We look forward to contributions from members, old and new, in this AGM, and plenty of brand new ideas!

After what we hope will be a lively and inclusive discussion, registered members will be ask to vote, in principle, to authorize the board to pursue one of these three options for the future of WSDC Ltd.

WSDC 2016 Newsletter #1, CAP applications, Indiegogo


WSDC 2016 OrgComm has released its first newsletter on 2nd NOV 2015. It includes information about the registration schedule, CAP applications and a first look at the host region of Stuttgart and its surrounding communities.

CAP applications are open from 2nd – 30th NOV 2015. Documents and terms can be found on the tournament website

There is currently an Indiegogo Crowdfunding campaign online, which aims at raising additional funds to alleviate costs for participants. Please share and contribute!

Best regards from OrgComm 2016,
Christopher Sanchez and Jana Gilke